<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tab Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tabright.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tabright.com</link>
	<description>... proving you don't have to be left to be right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does anyone do their home anymore &#8211; Another embarrassing White House error</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/30/does-anyone-do-their-home-anymore-another-embarrassing-white-house-error/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/30/does-anyone-do-their-home-anymore-another-embarrassing-white-house-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie macko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama honors criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human prop for White House speech turns out to have a less than stellar background... Leslie Macko...

Click on this article's title to learn more...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_468" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 169px"><img src="http://tabright.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/obama-seal.jpg" alt="Background Check Anyone?... Just a thought" title="Leslie Macko - White House misses criminal record of Obama prop for speech on unemployment benefits and need for extension" width="159" height="200" class="size-full wp-image-468" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Background Check Anyone?... Just a thought</p></div>The list of preventable White House errors has grown yet again.  According to a report on Fox News, one of the human props President Obama used in a recent speech has not been the model citizen you would expect.</p>
<p>According to the report, Leslie Macko lost her job a month after pleading guilty for felony prescription drug fraud.  She was sentenced one year of probation and has been seeking employment since then.  Macko completed her sentence in May, a mere couple of weeks prior to being invited to stand on stage with the President as he called for the extension of unemployment benefits. To make matters even more embarrassing, Macko had also previously been charged with felony grand larceny.</p>
<p>When asked about the situation, White House Press Secretary Gibbs simply stated that had the White House known of Macko&#8217;s criminal past, &#8220;&#8230;I doubt seriously that&#8230; um&#8230; she would have not participated in the event here&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>A quick call to authorities in Virginia, where Macko resides, verified that had the White House, FBI or other Federal authorities requested it, Macko&#8217;s record would have immediately been available to them.</p>
<p>Upon hearing the news, one critic of the Administration asked us, &#8220;Does anyone do their home work anymore?&#8221;</p>
<p>Our response, &#8216;Not apparently in the White House.&#8217; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/30/does-anyone-do-their-home-anymore-another-embarrassing-white-house-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Fed Res. Chairman the Federal Reserve&#8217;s Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/29/transcript-fed-res-chairman-the-federal-reserves-semiannual-monetary-policy-report-to-the-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/29/transcript-fed-res-chairman-the-federal-reserves-semiannual-monetary-policy-report-to-the-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fed Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's delivery of the Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress....

Click on this article's title to read the transcript...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is an unofficial transcript of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke&#8217;s speech presenting the Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.  The speech was delivered twice (on separate days), first to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (US Senate) July 21, and then again before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. (US House of Representatives) on July 22.</p>
<p>Three items to note from this speech:<br />
1) The Fed expects slow but continued economic growth in th US.<br />
2) inflation is expected to reach 1%.<br />
3) By the end of 2010, unemployment is expected to still be as high as 7.5%</p>
<p><strong>Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke : </strong>Chairman Dodd, Senator Shelby, and members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve&#8217;s Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.</p>
<p>Economic and Financial Developments<br />
The economic expansion that began in the middle of last year is proceeding at a moderate pace, supported by stimulative monetary and fiscal policies. Although fiscal policy and inventory restocking will likely be providing less impetus to the recovery than they have in recent quarters, rising demand from households and businesses should help sustain growth. In particular, real consumer spending appears to have expanded at about a 2-1/2 percent annual rate in the first half of this year, with purchases of durable goods increasing especially rapidly. However, the housing market remains weak, with the overhang of vacant or foreclosed houses weighing on home prices and construction.</p>
<p>An important drag on household spending is the slow recovery in the labor market and the attendant uncertainty about job prospects. After two years of job losses, private payrolls expanded at an average of about 100,000 per month during the first half of this year, a pace insufficient to reduce the unemployment rate materially. In all likelihood, a significant amount of time will be required to restore the nearly 8-1/2 million jobs that were lost over 2008 and 2009. Moreover, nearly half of the unemployed have been out of work for longer than six months. Long-term unemployment not only imposes exceptional near-term hardships on workers and their families, it also erodes skills and may have long-lasting effects on workers&#8217; employment and earnings prospects.</p>
<p>In the business sector, investment in equipment and software appears to have increased rapidly in the first half of the year, in part reflecting capital outlays that had been deferred during the downturn and the need of many businesses to replace aging equipment. In contrast, spending on nonresidential structures&#8211;weighed down by high vacancy rates and tight credit&#8211;has continued to contract, though some indicators suggest that the rate of decline may be slowing. Both U.S. exports and U.S. imports have been expanding, reflecting growth in the global economy and the recovery of world trade. Stronger exports have in turn helped foster growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector.</p>
<p>Inflation has remained low. The price index for personal consumption expenditures appears to have risen at an annual rate of less than 1 percent in the first half of the year. Although overall inflation has fluctuated, partly reflecting changes in energy prices, by a number of measures underlying inflation has trended down over the past two years. The slack in labor and product markets has damped wage and price pressures, and rapid increases in productivity have further reduced producers&#8217; unit labor costs.</p>
<p>My colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and I expect continued moderate growth, a gradual decline in the unemployment rate, and subdued inflation over the next several years. In conjunction with the June FOMC meeting, Board members and Reserve Bank presidents prepared forecasts of economic growth, unemployment, and inflation for the years 2010 through 2012 and over the longer run. The forecasts are qualitatively similar to those we released in February and May, although progress in reducing unemployment is now expected to be somewhat slower than we previously projected, and near-term inflation now looks likely to be a little lower. Most FOMC participants expect real GDP growth of 3 to 3-1/2 percent in 2010, and roughly 3-1/2 to 4-1/2 percent in 2011 and 2012. The unemployment rate is expected to decline to between 7 and 7-1/2 percent by the end of 2012. Most participants viewed uncertainty about the outlook for growth and unemployment as greater than normal, and the majority saw the risks to growth as weighted to the downside. Most participants projected that inflation will average only about 1 percent in 2010 and that it will remain low during 2011 and 2012, with the risks to the inflation outlook roughly balanced.</p>
<p>One factor underlying the Committee&#8217;s somewhat weaker outlook is that financial conditions&#8211;though much improved since the depth of the financial crisis&#8211;have become less supportive of economic growth in recent months. Notably, concerns about the ability of Greece and a number of other euro-area countries to manage their sizable budget deficits and high levels of public debt spurred a broad-based withdrawal from risk-taking in global financial markets in the spring, resulting in lower stock prices and wider risk spreads in the United States. In response to these fiscal pressures, European leaders put in place a number of strong measures, including an assistance package for Greece and €500 billion of funding to backstop the near-term financing needs of euro-area countries. To help ease strains in U.S. dollar funding markets, the Federal Reserve reestablished temporary dollar liquidity swap lines with the ECB and several other major central banks. To date, drawings under the swap lines have been limited, but we believe that the existence of these lines has increased confidence in dollar funding markets, helping to maintain credit availability in our own financial system.</p>
<p>Like financial conditions generally, the state of the U.S. banking system has also improved significantly since the worst of the crisis. Loss rates on most types of loans seem to be peaking, and, in the aggregate, bank capital ratios have risen to new highs. However, many banks continue to have a large volume of troubled loans on their books, and bank lending standards remain tight. With credit demand weak and with banks writing down problem credits, bank loans outstanding have continued to contract. Small businesses, which depend importantly on bank credit, have been particularly hard hit. At the Federal Reserve, we have been working to facilitate the flow of funds to creditworthy small businesses. Along with the other supervisory agencies, we issued guidance to banks and examiners emphasizing that lenders should do all they can to meet the needs of creditworthy borrowers, including small businesses.1 We also have conducted extensive training programs for our bank examiners, with the message that lending to viable small businesses is good for the safety and soundness of our banking system as well as for our economy. We continue to seek feedback from both banks and potential borrowers about credit conditions. For example, over the past six months we have convened more than 40 meetings around the country of lenders, small business representatives, bank examiners, government officials, and other stakeholders to exchange ideas about the challenges faced by small businesses, particularly in obtaining credit. A capstone conference on addressing the credit needs of small businesses was held at the Board of Governors in Washington last week.2 This testimony includes an addendum that summarizes the findings of this effort and possible next steps.</p>
<p>Federal Reserve Policy<br />
The Federal Reserve&#8217;s response to the financial crisis and the recession has involved several components. First, in response to the periods of intense illiquidity and dysfunction in financial markets that characterized the crisis, the Federal Reserve undertook a range of measures and set up emergency programs designed to provide liquidity to financial institutions and markets in the form of fully secured, mostly short-term loans. Over time, these programs helped to stem the panic and to restore normal functioning in a number of key financial markets, supporting the flow of credit to the economy. As financial markets stabilized, the Federal Reserve shut down most of these programs during the first half of this year and took steps to normalize the terms on which it lends to depository institutions. The only such programs currently open to provide new liquidity are the recently reestablished dollar liquidity swap lines with major central banks that I noted earlier. Importantly, our broad-based programs achieved their intended purposes with no loss to taxpayers. All of the loans extended through the multiborrower facilities that have come due have been repaid in full, with interest. In addition, the Board does not expect the Federal Reserve to incur a net loss on any of the secured loans provided during the crisis to help prevent the disorderly failure of systemically significant financial institutions.</p>
<p>A second major component of the Federal Reserve&#8217;s response to the financial crisis and recession has involved both standard and less conventional forms of monetary policy. Over the course of the crisis, the FOMC aggressively reduced its target for the federal funds rate to a range of 0 to 1/4 percent, which has been maintained since the end of 2008. And, as indicated in the statement released after the June meeting, the FOMC continues to anticipate that economic conditions&#8211;including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations&#8211;are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.3</p>
<p>In addition to the very low federal funds rate, the FOMC has provided monetary policy stimulus through large-scale purchases of longer-term Treasury debt, federal agency debt, and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). A range of evidence suggests that these purchases helped improve conditions in mortgage markets and other private credit markets and put downward pressure on longer-term private borrowing rates and spreads.</p>
<p>Compared with the period just before the financial crisis, the System&#8217;s portfolio of domestic securities has increased from about $800 billion to $2 trillion and has shifted from consisting of 100 percent Treasury securities to having almost two-thirds of its investments in agency-related securities. In addition, the average maturity of the Treasury portfolio nearly doubled, from three and one-half years to almost seven years. The FOMC plans to return the System&#8217;s portfolio to a more normal size and composition over the longer term, and the Committee has been discussing alternative approaches to accomplish that objective.</p>
<p>One approach is for the Committee to adjust its reinvestment policy&#8211;that is, its policy for handling repayments of principal on the securities&#8211;to gradually normalize the portfolio over time. Currently, repayments of principal from agency debt and MBS are not being reinvested, allowing the holdings of those securities to run off as the repayments are received. By contrast, the proceeds from maturing Treasury securities are being reinvested in new issues of Treasury securities with similar maturities. At some point, the Committee may want to shift its reinvestment of the proceeds from maturing Treasury securities to shorter-term issues, so as to gradually reduce the average maturity of our Treasury holdings toward pre-crisis levels, while leaving the aggregate value of those holdings unchanged. At this juncture, however, no decision to change reinvestment policy has been made.</p>
<p>A second way to normalize the size and composition of the Federal Reserve&#8217;s securities portfolio would be to sell some holdings of agency debt and MBS. Selling agency securities, rather than simply letting them run off, would shrink the portfolio and return it to a composition of all Treasury securities more quickly. FOMC participants broadly agree that sales of agency-related securities should eventually be used as part of the strategy to normalize the portfolio. Such sales will be implemented in accordance with a framework communicated well in advance and will be conducted at a gradual pace. Because changes in the size and composition of the portfolio could affect financial conditions, however, any decisions regarding the commencement or pace of asset sales will be made in light of the Committee&#8217;s evaluation of the outlook for employment and inflation.</p>
<p>As I noted earlier, the FOMC continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. At some point, however, the Committee will need to begin to remove monetary policy accommodation to prevent the buildup of inflationary pressures. When that time comes, the Federal Reserve will act to increase short-term interest rates by raising the interest rate it pays on reserve balances that depository institutions hold at Federal Reserve Banks. To tighten the linkage between the interest rate paid on reserves and other short-term market interest rates, the Federal Reserve may also drain reserves from the banking system. Two tools for draining reserves from the system are being developed and tested and will be ready when needed. First, the Federal Reserve is putting in place the capacity to conduct large reverse repurchase agreements with an expanded set of counterparties. Second, the Federal Reserve has tested a term deposit facility, under which instruments similar to the certificates of deposit that banks offer their customers will be auctioned to depository institutions.</p>
<p>Of course, even as the Federal Reserve continues prudent planning for the ultimate withdrawal of extraordinary monetary policy accommodation, we also recognize that the economic outlook remains unusually uncertain. We will continue to carefully assess ongoing financial and economic developments, and we remain prepared to take further policy actions as needed to foster a return to full utilization of our nation&#8217;s productive potential in a context of price stability.</p>
<p>Financial Reform Legislation<br />
Last week, the Congress passed landmark legislation to reform the financial system and financial regulation, and the President signed the bill into law this morning. That legislation represents significant progress toward reducing the likelihood of future financial crises and strengthening the capacity of financial regulators to respond to risks that may emerge. Importantly, the legislation encourages an approach to supervision designed to foster the stability of the financial system as a whole as well as the safety and soundness of individual institutions. Within the Federal Reserve, we have already taken steps to strengthen our analysis and supervision of the financial system and systemically important financial firms in ways consistent with the new legislation. In particular, making full use of the Federal Reserve&#8217;s broad expertise in economics, financial markets, payment systems, and bank supervision, we have significantly changed our supervisory framework to improve our consolidated supervision of large, complex bank holding companies, and we are enhancing the tools we use to monitor the financial sector and to identify potential systemic risks. In addition, the briefings prepared for meetings of the FOMC are now providing increased coverage and analysis of potential risks to the financial system, thus supporting the Federal Reserve&#8217;s ability to make effective monetary policy and to enhance financial stability.</p>
<p>Much work remains to be done, both to implement through regulation the extensive provisions of the new legislation and to develop the macroprudential approach called for by the Congress. However, I believe that the legislation, together with stronger regulatory standards for bank capital and liquidity now being developed, will place our financial system on a sounder foundation and minimize the risk of a repetition of the devastating events of the past three years.</p>
<p>Thank you. I would be pleased to respond to your questions.</p>
<p>TabRight.com <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; strong: none;" href="http://www.tabright.com/">Proving you don&#8217;t have to be left to be RIGHT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/29/transcript-fed-res-chairman-the-federal-reserves-semiannual-monetary-policy-report-to-the-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Rates by State &#8211; June 2010</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/28/june-2010-unemployment-fishin/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/28/june-2010-unemployment-fishin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Q Public</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preliminary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonally adjusted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tab right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment June 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Obama's First Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate for]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for LA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for South Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment rate for Wyoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wyoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/2010/07/28/7914/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="size-full wp-image-2714" title="Unemployment rates - June 2010 - State by State" src="http://tabright.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/unemployment-small.jpg" alt="Unemployment Rates for June 2010 - State by State" width="49" height="33" /> Unemployment rates continue to be high (often in double digits) across the country... What was your state's rate?  

Click on this article's title to find out...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2760" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 87px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2760" title="unemployment-2" src="http://tabright.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/unemployment-2.jpg" alt="June 2010 Unemployment rates" width="77" height="77" /><p class="wp-caption-text">June 2010 Unemployment</p></div>
<p>Despite the Obama Administration&#8217;s attempt to labeled this as the &#8216;Summer of Economic Recovery&#8217;, economists are reportedly finding it difficult to find real overall growth in the nation&#8217;s job market &#8211; a necessity for any recovery.  Worse yet, many continue to warn to expect even higher unemployment rates as the Census winds down and other government programs are forced to contract as stimulus funds dry up.  </p>
<p>How is high is your state&#8217;s unemployment rate?</p>
<p>Alabama 10.3% </p>
<p>Alaska 7.9% </p>
<p>Arizona 9.6% </p>
<p>Arkansas 7.5% </p>
<p>California 12.3% </p>
<p>Colorado 8.0% </p>
<p>Connecticut 8.8% </p>
<p>Delaware 8.5% </p>
<p>D.C. 10.0% </p>
<p>Florida 11.4% </p>
<p>Georgia 10.0% </p>
<p>Hawaii 6.3% </p>
<p>Idaho 8.8% </p>
<p>Illinois 10.4%  </p>
<p>Indiana 10.1% </p>
<p>Iowa 6.8% </p>
<p>Kansas 6.5% </p>
<p>Kentucky 10.0%   </p>
<p>Louisiana 7.0% </p>
<p>Maine 8.0% </p>
<p>Maryland 7.1% </p>
<p>Massachusetts 9.0% </p>
<p>Michigan 13.2% </p>
<p>Minnesota 6.8% </p>
<p>Mississippi 11.0% </p>
<p>Missouri 9.1%  </p>
<p>Montana 7.3% </p>
<p>Nebraska 4.8%</p>
<p>Nevada 14.2% </p>
<p>New Hampshire 5.9% </p>
<p>New Jersey 9.6% </p>
<p>New Mexico 8.2% </p>
<p>New York 8.2% </p>
<p>North Carolina 10.0% </p>
<p>North Dakota 3.6% </p>
<p>Ohio 10.5% </p>
<p>Oklahoma 6.8% </p>
<p>Oregon 10.5% </p>
<p>Pennsylvania 9.2% </p>
<p>Puerto Rico 16.3% </p>
<p>Rhode Island 12.0% </p>
<p>South Carolina 10.7% </p>
<p>South Dakota 4.5% </p>
<p>Tennessee 10.1% </p>
<p>Texas 8.2% </p>
<p>Utah 7.2% </p>
<p>Vermont 6.0% </p>
<p>Virginia 7.0% </p>
<p>Washington 8.9% </p>
<p>West Virginia 8.5% </p>
<p>Wisconsin 7.9% </p>
<p>Wyoming 6.8% </p>
<p>Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics</p>
<p><a href="http://tabright.com/2009/03/29/about-to-lose-your-job-you-may-want-to-move-to-massachusetts/?preview=true&amp;preview_id=2924&amp;preview_nonce=6b144ccd8f">Which state pays more unemployment benefits per checks than any other state? &lt;Click Here to Find Out&gt;</a></p>
<p>TabRight.com <a href="http://www.TabRight.com">Proving you don&#8217;t have to be left to be RIGHT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/28/june-2010-unemployment-fishin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikileaks &#8211; Traitor or Patriot?</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/27/wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/27/wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Q Public</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked us documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/2010/07/26/wikileaks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publishing over 200,000 pages of clasified US military documents... Is this the act of a Traitor or a Patriot?

Click on this article's title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leaking of secret government documents is not new.  Government secrets have a long history of being leaked by the press.  Likewise the debate over if those who leak and those who publish such material are traitors or patriots is also nothing new.  That debate has been around just as long and no doubt will continue long after this administration has left office.</p>
<p>What sets this leak apart from most is that some experts believe it&#8217;s unedited release may place US troops (possibly specific individuals) in even greater danger than before &#8211; potentially life threatening danger.  Unlike many of the published leaks of the past, the tradition of only publishing of specific excerpts was not honored.  Instead Wikileaks, not limited by the associated cost of traditional print media, published over 200,000 pages of classified documentation &#8211; unedited, and  regardless of the lives it may put at risk.</p>
<p>So is Wikileaks (or should I say it&#8217;s founder  Julian Assange) a traitor or patriot?  As the site is actually a British site, I&#8217;ll leave that decision to the Brits.  However I will argue, at the least, that Mr. Assange has acted very irresponsibly.  I support the fight to keep the government open as to what it is doing but there are limits that must be honored.  Regardless of his own nationality, those he has placed into the line of fire are there now because of his actions.  That&#8217;s not responsible journalism or the act of a patriot.  In the words of one person I talked to today, &#8220;&#8230;it&#8217;s the action of a publicity hungry site director who doesn&#8217;t care who gets hurt.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/27/wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling Data: 38% Support a Moratorium on New Government Regulations</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/26/polling-data-38-support-a-moratorium-on-new-government-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/26/polling-data-38-support-a-moratorium-on-new-government-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest polling data from Gallup and Rasmussen on The latest polling data on US politics, national security, the economy and more...

Click on this articles title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_381" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 138px"><img class="size-full wp-image-381" title="Polling Data" src="http://tabright.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/polls.jpg" alt="The latest polling data on US politics, national security, the economy and more..." width="128" height="66" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Polling Data</p></div>
<p>The latest polling data from Gallup and Rasmussen on The latest polling data on US politics, national security, the economy and more&#8230;</p>
<p>Politics</p>
<p>44% According to Rasmussen Reports, strongly disapprove of President Obama&#8217;s performance of his duties (26% strongly approve)<br />
47% According to Gallup, disapprove of President Obama&#8217;s job performance (44% approve)<br />
50% of Americans state they have little or no confidence in Congress (11% State they have a great deal or a lot of confidence) &#8211; the worst rating since Gallup first polled this question in 1973<br />
38% Support a one year moratorium on new government regulations (34% oppose)<br />
27% Stae the US is heading in the right direction<br />
45% State they would vote Republican in a generic Congressional ballot (36% Democratic)<br />
66% Expect more partisanship<br />
66% Rate Michelle Obama favorably</p>
<p>Economy</p>
<p>75% State a Free Market economy is better than a Government managed economy<br />
51% Rate the economy as Poor (10% as Excellent/Good)<br />
64% Believe the economy is getting worse (31% better)<br />
46% Believe the standard of living is getting better (35% worse)<br />
60% Do not expect Social Security when they retire<br />
23% State they have confidence in American banks (down from 41% in June 2007)<br />
89% Are concerned about the economic impact of the Oil Leak in the Gulf<br />
78% Believe a poor economy is likely to cause an increase in crime<br />
14% Are likely to miss or be late on a mortgage payment in the near future</p>
<p>International/National Security/911 Related</p>
<p>33% of Afghans approve of their nation&#8217;s leadership<br />
44% of Afghans state they approve of President Hamid Karzi<br />
39% Expect the situation in Afghanistan to get worse in the next 6 months (20% expect it to get better)<br />
58% in New York oppose a Mosque being built near ground zero (20% favor)<br />
31% Expect US-Isreal relations to worsen over the next 12 months<br />
37% Support the US embargo on Cuba (37% oppose it)</p>
<p>Enviroment</p>
<p>56% Support off shore drilling<br />
47% Favor deep-water drilling</p>
<p>The Rest</p>
<p>65% Believe the US Postal Service should be required to cut back services<br />
57% State they would be likely to change their fast food order if they knew nutritional facts<br />
63% Oppose &#8216;Full Year School Calendar&#8217;<br />
52% Support a ban on sugary snacks and soft drinks<br />
87% Feel the media covers celebrities too much<br />
65% Believe the US is fair and decent</p>
<p><For additional information on the polling data above, please visit <a href="Gallup.com">Gallup.com</a> and <a href="RasmussenReports.com">RasmussenReports.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tabright.com/polls">For additional Polling Data on TabRight.com, click here&#8230;</a></p>
<p>TabRight.com <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; strong: none;" href="http://www.tabright.com/">Proving you don&#8217;t have to be left to be RIGHT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/26/polling-data-38-support-a-moratorium-on-new-government-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Shirley Sherrod&#8217;s March 27th Speech</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/25/transcript-shirley-sherrods-march-27th-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/25/transcript-shirley-sherrods-march-27th-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Left</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shirley sherrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The complete unofficial transcript of Shirley Sherrod's controversial speech to the N.A.A.C.P. in March...

Click on this article's title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a complete unofficial transcript of Shirely Sherrod&#8217;s March 27th speech.  As with all unofficial transcripts provided on TabRight.com, we have taken efforts to ensure the content is correct, however to error is human and readers should be reminded the content has not been verified by those quoted.</p>
<p><strong>Shirley Sherrod: </strong><em>Good evening.</p>
<p>Olivia, I want to thank you for those kind words. You know, it&#8217;s been a pleasure working with her over the last 10 years. I&#8217;ve missed the work. [I] had to move on to some other &#8212; other work, and I&#8217;ll talk to you more about that.</p>
<p>To the president of the NAACP, here, and the board of directors, and members, and all the others here, it is indeed a pleasure for me to be with you this evening. And I want to say to you, I am very proud to be working with the Obama Administration to help rural America&#8217;s welfare. I want to do all I can to help rural communities such as yours to be a place where we can have a quality life and a comfortable life for our families and our friends.</p>
<p>But before I give you &#8212; even before I &#8212; I go into what I have here, I want to &#8212; I want to second something that Olivia said. You know, I grew up on the farm and I didn&#8217;t want to have anything to do with agriculture, but she was right. There are jobs at USDA, and many times there are no people of color to fill those jobs &#8217;cause we shy away from agriculture. We hear the word &#8220;agriculture&#8221; and think only of working in the fields.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ve heard of a lot of layoffs. Have you heard of anybody in the federal government losing their job? That&#8217;s all that I need to say, okay? And I &#8212; I might say a little bit more to the young people. It&#8217;s good to have you all here.</p>
<p>I want to share something with you this evening, something that&#8217;s always heavy on my heart each day, but especially at this time of the year.</p>
<p>It was 45 years ago today that my father&#8217;s funeral was held. I was a young girl at the age of 17 when my father was murdered by a white man in Baker County. In Baker County, the murder of black people occurred periodically, and in every case the white men who murdered them were never punished. It was no different in my father&#8217;s case. There were three witnesses to his murder, but the grand jury refused to indict the white man who murdered him.</p>
<p>I should tell you a little about Baker County. In case you don&#8217;t know where it is, it&#8217;s located less than 20 miles southwest of Albany. Now, there were two sheriffs from Baker County that &#8212; whose names you probably never heard but I know in the case of one, the thing he did many, many years ago still affect us today. And that sheriff was Claude Screws. Claude Screws lynched a black man. And this was at the beginning of the 40s. And the strange thing back then was an all-white federal jury convicted him not of murder but of depriving Bobby Hall &#8212; and I should say that Bobby Hall was a relative &#8212; depriving him of his civil rights.</p>
<p>So, in the opinion, when the justice wrote his opinion and justifying overturning the conviction, he said you had to prove that as the sheriff was murdering Bobby Hall he was thinking of depriving him of his civil rights. That&#8217;s where the whole issue of proving intent came from and you heard it a lot. It was used a lot during the Civil Rights Movement. What you also heard a lot when Rodney King was beaten out in California. Y&#8217;all might remember that. They kept saying you had to prove intent &#8212; and that came from Screws vs. the U.S. Government.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m told that case is studied by every law student. And usually when we have people coming into Southwest Georgia, and wanting to take some tours of &#8212; of things were some events happened during the Civil Rights Movement, I usually take them to the courthouse in Newton to show where Bobby&#8217;s Hall&#8217;s body was displayed.</p>
<p>During my years of growing up, the sheriff was L. Warren Johnson. He wanted to be called &#8220;The Gator,&#8221; and that&#8217;s how people referred to him &#8217;cause he had a holler that would make you want to tremble. He also killed a lot of black people &#8212; and Gator Johnson was the law in Baker County. And when I say that I mean no one, black or white, could ride through the County with an out-of-county tag. That means you could have a tag from anywhere else in Georgia &#8212; you couldn&#8217;t ride through Baker County without being stopped. And the Atlanta [Journal]-Constitution reported at one point that his take on the road was at least 150,000 dollars a year &#8212; and that was during the 60s.</p>
<p>My father was a farmer. And growing up on the farm, my dream was to get as far away from the farm and Baker County as I could get. And picking cotton, picking cucumbers, shaking peanuts for a little while before they, you know&#8230; &#8212; the older folk know what I&#8217;m talking about &#8212; when you had to shake them and take them up to the pole [ph] and&#8230;put them around that, you know &#8212; doing all that work on the farm, it will make you get an education more than anything else.</p>
<p>But I didn&#8217;t want to just get an education. I wanted to leave the farm and Baker County. It was &#8212; life was &#8212; the older folk know what I&#8217;m talking about &#8212; the segregation and the discrimination and the &#8212; and the racist acts that we had to endure during those years made me just want to leave. And you know, we used to have people who&#8217;d leave and go north &#8212; you all know how they come back talking and they come back looking. I learned later that some of those cars they drove home were rented.</p>
<p>But it made you want to go north, &#8217;cause you thought they were free up there and you thought everybody was free in the North. So, my goal was not to even go to college in the South &#8217;cause I, you know, I was always you find your husband at college. So, I didn&#8217;t want to find one living in the South. I wanted to go to college in the North so I could get a husband from the North, never ever come back down here and live again.</p>
<p>But, you know, you can never say what you&#8217;ll never do. And it was during March, my senior year in high school. I mean my father was just everything to us. I had four sisters &#8212; I&#8217;m the oldest. My mother &#8212; there are six of us, but my father wanted a son so bad. We were all girls. We all had boys&#8217; nickname[s]. I was &#8220;Bill.&#8221; Now, he loved his girls but he wanted a son so bad. And when my sister was about &#8212; my youngest sister was eight, he convinced my mother to try one more time for this boy.</p>
<p>So, to my surprise &#8212; my senior year of high school &#8212; I thought my mother was just sick. I didn&#8217;t know what was wrong with her, you know, really worried. And one day my best friend at school said, &#8220;How&#8217;s your mama doing?&#8221; I said, &#8220;She just doesn&#8217;t seem to be getting any better.&#8221; She said, &#8220;Girl, your daddy was up at the store yesterday giving out cigars. Your mama [is] going to have a baby.&#8221; He told everyone that that baby was the son. And he was, in fact, having a new home built. He was the first person to get a loan on his own to build a house. He wanted to build a brick house so bad, but they told him a black man could not borrow money to build a brick house. They had to choose blocks, you know.</p>
<p>So &#8212; and this new house that was being built &#8212; there were five daughters &#8212; there was this one room that was the boys&#8217; room &#8212; his son&#8217;s room. He told everybody it was a boy. And, in fact, it was painted blue. And he came &#8212; he and my mother came to pick me up from school one day early to go to Albany with him to pick the furniture for this boys&#8217; room. He didn&#8217;t live to see him. My brother was born two months after he died, in June of &#8216;65.</p>
<p>We started the Movement. But before I get there I need to tell you something I &#8212; and I want to say this to the young people. You know, I told how I looked forward and I dreamt so much about moving north and from the farm, especially in the South, and I knew that after &#8212; on the night of my father&#8217;s death I felt I had to do something. I had to do something in answer to what had happened.</p>
<p>My father wasn&#8217;t the first black person to be killed. He was a leader in the community. He wasn&#8217;t the first to be killed by white men in the county. But I couldn&#8217;t just let his death go without doing something in answer to what happened. I made the commitment on the night of my father&#8217;s death, at the age of 17, that I would not leave the South, that I would stay in the South and devote my life to working for change. And I&#8217;ve been true to that commitment all of these 45 years.</p>
<p>You know, when you look at some of the things that I&#8217;ve done through the years and when you look at some of things that happened &#8212; I went to school &#8212; my &#8212; my first two years at Fort Valley &#8212; I know there are some Fort Valley graduates here too &#8212; I did my first two years at Fort Valley but so much was happening back at home &#8212; and then I met this man, I&#8217;ll tell you a little about him &#8212; that I transferred back to Albany State and did the last two years.</p>
<p>But two weeks after I went to school at Fort Valley, they called and told me that a bunch of white men had gathered outside of our home and burned the cross one night. Now, in the house was my mother, my four sisters, and my brother, who was born June 6 &#8212; and this was September. That was all in that house that night. Well, my mother and one of my sisters went out on the porch. My mama had a gun. Another sister &#8212; you know some of this stuff, it&#8217;s like movies, some of the stuff that happened through the years &#8212; I won&#8217;t go into everything. I&#8217;ll just tell you about this. One of my sisters got on the phone &#8217;cause we had organized the movements starting June of &#8216;65, shortly &#8212; not long after my father&#8217;s death.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how I met my husband. He wasn&#8217;t from the North&#8230;.He&#8217;s from up south in Virginia. But anyway my brother and my sisters got on the phone &#8212; they called other black men in the county. And it wasn&#8217;t long before they had surrounded these white men. And they had to keep one young man from actually using his gun on one of them. You probably would have read about it had that happened that night. But they actually allowed those men to leave. They &#8212; They backed away and allowed them to get out of there.</p>
<p>But I won&#8217;t go into some of the other stuff that happened that night, but do know that my mother and my sister were out on the porch with a gun, and my mother said, &#8220;I see you and I know who you are.&#8221; She recognized some of them. She&#8217;ll tell you that she became the first black elected official in Baker County just 11 years later, and she is still serving you all. She&#8217;s chair of the board of education and she&#8217;s been serving almost 34 years.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know how I would go about carrying out the commitment I made that night, but when the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, [name of individual unclear 14:35] &#8212; he was the one who came to Albany and started the movement there in 1961. And he stayed. You know, a lot of them went into the communities and they worked during the early part of the movement and they left. But he continued to stay in Southwest Georgia, and we&#8217;ve done a lot of stuff through the years&#8230;.Some of the things that have happened to us, you probably be on the edge of your seat if I were to tell you about some of them. We&#8217;ve been in some very, very dangerous situations through the years, but we continue to work.</p>
<p>And, you know God is so good &#8217;cause people like me don&#8217;t get appointed to positions like State Director of Rural Development. They just don&#8217;t get these kinds of positions &#8217;cause I&#8217;ve been out there at everywhere grassroots level and I&#8217;ve paid some dues.</p>
<p>But when I&#8230;made the commitment years ago I didn&#8217;t know how &#8212; I didn&#8217;t&#8230;I prayed about it that night and as our house filled with people I was back in one of the bedrooms praying and asking God to show me what I could do. I didn&#8217;t have &#8212; the path wasn&#8217;t laid out that night. I just made the decision that I would stay and work. And &#8212; And over the years things just happened.</p>
<p>And young people: I just want you to know that when you&#8217;re true to what God wants you to do the path just opens up &#8212; and things just come to you, you know. God is good &#8212; I can tell you that.</p>
<p>When I made that commitment, I was making that commitment to black people &#8212; and to black people only. But, you know, God will show you things and He&#8217;ll put things in your path so that &#8212; that you realize that the struggle is really about poor people, you know.</p>
<p>The first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm, he &#8212; he took a long time talking, but he was trying to show me he was superior to me. I know what he was doing. But he had come to me for help. What he didn&#8217;t know &#8211;  while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me &#8212; was I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him.</p>
<p>I was struggling with the fact that so many black people have lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So, I didn&#8217;t give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough so that when he &#8212; I &#8212; I assumed the Department of Agriculture had sent him to me, either that or the &#8212; or the Georgia Department of Agriculture. And he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him.</p>
<p>So I took him to a white lawyer that we had &#8212; that had&#8230;attended some of the training that we had provided, &#8217;cause Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for the family farmer. So I figured if I take him to one of them that his own kind would take care of him.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s when it was revealed to me that, y&#8217;all, it&#8217;s about poor versus those who have, and not so much about white &#8212; it is about white and black, but it&#8217;s not &#8212; you know, it opened my eyes, &#8217;cause I took him to one of his own and I put him in his hand, and felt okay, I&#8217;ve done my job. But, during that time we would have these injunctions against the Department of Agriculture and &#8212; so, they couldn&#8217;t foreclose on him. And I want you to know that the county supervisor had done something to him that I have not seen yet that they&#8217;ve done to any other farmer, black or white. And what they did to him caused him to not be able to file Chapter 12 bankruptcy.</p>
<p>So, everything was going along fine &#8212; I&#8217;m thinking he&#8217;s being taken care of by the white lawyer and then they lifted the injunction against USDA in May of &#8216;87 for two weeks and he was one of 13 farmers in Georgia who received a foreclosure notice. He called me. I said, &#8220;Well, go on and make an appointment at the lawyer. Let me know when it is and I&#8217;ll meet you there.&#8221;</p>
<p>So we met at the lawyer&#8217;s office on &#8212; on the day they had given him. And this lawyer sat there &#8212; he had been paying this lawyer, y&#8217;all. That&#8217;s what got me. He had been paying the lawyer since November, and this was May. And the lawyer sat there and looked at him and said, &#8220;Well, y&#8217;all are getting old. Why don&#8217;t you just let the farm go?&#8221; I could not believe he said that, so I said to the lawyer &#8212; I told him, &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe you said that.&#8221; I said, &#8220;It&#8217;s obvious to me if he cannot file a Chapter 12 bankruptcy to &#8212; to stop this foreclosure, you have to file an 11. And the lawyer said to me, &#8220;I&#8217;ll do whatever you say&#8230;.whatever you think&#8221; &#8212; that&#8217;s the way he put it. But he&#8217;s paying him. He wasn&#8217;t paying me any money, you know. So he said &#8212; the lawyer said &#8212; he would work on it.</p>
<p>And then, about seven days before that land would have been sold at the courthouse steps, the farmer called me and said the lawyer wasn&#8217;t doing anything. And that&#8217;s when I spent time there in my office calling everybody I could think of to try to see &#8212; help me find the lawyer who would handle this. And finally, I remembered that I had gone to see one just 40 miles away in Americus with the black farmers. So, I &#8211;</p>
<p>[Video and audio interupted - video appears to be spliced, content lost unknown]</p>
<p>Well, working with him made me see that it&#8217;s really about those who have versus those who don&#8217;t, you know. And they could be black, and they could be white; they could be Hispanic. And it made me realize then that I needed to work to help poor people &#8212; those who don&#8217;t have access the way others have.</p>
<p>I want to just share something with you and&#8230;I think it helps to &#8212; it &#8212; you know, when I learned this, I&#8217;m like, &#8220;Oh, my goodness.&#8221; You know, back in the late 17th and 18th century, black &#8212; there were black indentured servants and white indentured servants, and they all would work for the seven years and &#8212; and get their freedom. And they didn&#8217;t see any difference in each other. Nobody worried about skin color. They married each other, you know. These were poor whites and poor blacks in the same boat, except they were slaves. But they were both slaves and both had their opportunity to work out on the slavery.</p>
<p>But then they started looking at the injustices that they faced and started then trying &#8212; you know, the people with money &#8212; you know, they started &#8212; the&#8230;poor whites and poor blacks who were &#8212; they &#8212; you know, they married each other. They lived together. They were just like we would be. And they started looking at what was happening to them and decided we need to do something about it &#8212; you know, about this. Well, the people with money, the elite, decided, &#8220;Hey, we need to do something here to divide them.&#8221;</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s when they made black people servants for life. That&#8217;s when they put laws in place forbidding them to marry each other. That&#8217;s when they created the racism that we know of today. They did it to keep us divided. And they &#8212; it started working so well, they said, &#8220;Gosh, looks like we&#8217;ve come up on something here that can last generations.&#8221; And here we are over 400 years later, and it&#8217;s still working. What we have to do is get that out of our heads. There is no difference between us. The only difference is that the folks with money want to stay in power and, whether it&#8217;s health care or whatever it is, they&#8217;ll do what they need to do to keep that power, you know. It&#8217;s always about money, y&#8217;all.</p>
<p>You know, I haven&#8217;t seen such a mean-spirited people as I&#8217;ve seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn&#8217;t it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush&#8217;s and we didn&#8217;t do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President.</p>
<p>I wanted to give you that little history, especially the young people. I want you to know they created it, you know, not just for us. But we got the brunt of it &#8217;cause they needed to elevate what is just a little higher than us to make them think that we&#8217;re so much better, and then we &#8212; they would never work with us, you know, to try to change the situation that they were all in.</p>
<p>But where am I going with this? You know, I couldn&#8217;t say 45 years ago &#8212; I couldn&#8217;t stand here and say what I&#8217;m saying &#8212; what I will say to you tonight. Like I told you, God helped me to see that it&#8217;s not just about black people &#8212; it&#8217;s about poor people. And I&#8217;ve come a long way. I knew that I couldn&#8217;t live with hate, you know. As my mother has said to so many, &#8220;If we had tried to live with hate in our hearts, we&#8217;d probably be dead now.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve come to realize that we have to work together and &#8212; you know, it&#8217;s sad that we don&#8217;t have a room full of white and blacks here tonight, &#8217;cause we have to overcome the divisions that we have. We have to get to the point where, as Tony Morrison said, &#8220;Race exists but it doesn&#8217;t matter.&#8221; We have to work just as hard. I know it&#8217;s &#8212; you know, that division is still here, but our communities are not going to thrive &#8212; you know, our children won&#8217;t have the &#8212; the communities that they need to be able to stay in and live in and &#8212; and have a good life if we can&#8217;t figure this out, you all. White people, black people, Hispanic people, we all have to do our part to make our communities a safe place, a healthy place, a good environment.</p>
<p>You know so that companies &#8212; why would a company want to locate in some of these places? You know, I&#8230; &#8212; it&#8217;s so sad that, as I go around the State, people ask me, &#8220;Where are you from?&#8221; &#8220;Yeah, I&#8217;m living in Albany.&#8221; &#8220;Oh, a lot of crime they&#8217;re in.&#8221; You know, nothing good you could say too much about Albany anymore, and&#8230;a lot of it is brought on by folks who live there, you know? People who live there. You read the paper &#8212; If you read the paper and listen to the TV station there in Albany, you wouldn&#8217;t want to go there and live. You know, people are still fighting each other &#8212; worse, I believe, now. Least it was open during the Civil Rights Movement. It was a lick here and there &#8212; and my husband got in the brunt of a lot of them. But now it&#8217;s&#8230;really in such a way that it hurts &#8217;cause it&#8217;s going to keep the jobs away.</p>
<p>You know, you can go to a community and you can just about tell &#8212; and I&#8217;m travelling all around where people work together, you know. You&#8217;re not losing this many jobs. You&#8217;re getting a few. You know, we have a beautiful country. We have a beautiful part of this State &#8212; the southern part of this State &#8212; but it&#8217;s not thriving. And we need to figure out why. Well, we kind of know, but we need to work on why.</p>
<p>And &#8212; And young folks, you know when I was growing up, you had to get home from school and go to the fields. But y&#8217;all don&#8217;t have to do that no more. You should be excelling, you know.</p>
<p>Parents, you&#8217;ve got to set some goals for your children, you know. You cannot allow them not to try to become the best they could be, and not study&#8230;.you know. Y&#8217;all must love working in the chicken house. (I know they closed for one year.)</p>
<p>But change has to start with us and&#8230;somehow we&#8217;ve got to make the other side of town work with us. We&#8217;ve got to make our communities what they need to be and our young people, I&#8217;m not picking on you, but you got to, but y&#8217;all got to&#8230;step up to the plate. You&#8217;ve got to step up to the plate. You are capable of being very, very smart people. You are capable of being those doctors and lawyers. You&#8217;re capable of running your own business.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what &#8212; one of things in the position I&#8217;m in&#8230;one of the things that really hurt &#8212; one of the programs we had with some of the most money in it, you know, it&#8217;s with business and industry. And I sit up their and I&#8217;m signing off on six million, three million, two million &#8212; but who is it going to? Not one so far. And when I got a report on where we are with it, we&#8217;re &#8212; we&#8217;re approaching 80 million dollars since October 1st. But not one dime to a black business &#8212; not one, you know.</p>
<p>And I know as a young person you&#8217;re thinking good times. But, hey, don&#8217;t let life pass you by having a good time. You can enjoy it, but be serious, you know. And there are jobs in agriculture. There&#8217;s&#8230;a program, the 1890 Scholars Program and they are &#8212; they&#8217;re connected with every 1890 Land-Grant institution, and &#8212; and let me tell you what that is. That&#8217;s the black Land-Grant institutions, and there are about 17 and Tuskegee.</p>
<p>They &#8212; You can actually get a scholarship &#8212; and Fort Valley State is the main grant in Georgia, the 1890; the 1862 is the white Land-Grant, that&#8217;s the University of Georgia &#8212; you can get a scholarship and every summer you work at one of those agencies while you are in school. And when you get out, it&#8217;s a automatic job. Agencies like Natural Resource and Conservation Service (that&#8217;s RCS), Farm Service Agency (that&#8217;s the old Farmers Home Administration), Rural Development. Those are the major three. But there are others, so many other jobs, so many. Just in rural development nationwide, there are over 6000 employees. But you can go up there to Washington, to the Department of Agriculture &#8212; it&#8217;s on both sides of the street.</p>
<p>In Rural Development, there are 129 employees and guess how many of them are people of color? Anybody want to take a guess &#8212; that&#8217;s in Georgia? I got &#8212; there are 129 in my agency. How many? It&#8217;s more than two. Little more than 12. There are less than 20 of us. We have six area offices in the State and subarea offices and when I look at who&#8217;s coming up the line in the agencies &#8212; in the agency, there are not many of us, &#8217;cause we think &#8220;agriculture&#8221; is a bad word. We think it&#8217;s working in the fields. Some of the best paying jobs you ever want to have, okay?</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t keep at you with that kind of stuff. But let &#8212; just know that you can &#8212; there&#8217;s another point I want to make, though. You know, coming out of slavery black folks used to help each other. That&#8217;s how they built the schools that we have. You know, that&#8217;s how they bought the land that we have &#8212; that we have about lost all of it. You know that our people had over 15 million acres, and, as black people, [we] have less than 2 million acres of farm land left. And we will sell it for nothing &#8212; for nothing. </p>
<p>You know, I was helping a family here recently: 515 acres of land, never had a drop of debt on it since the grandfather bought it years ago and he &#8212; he died in 1974. And two cousins up in the North, guess what they decided? They tried to force a sale of every acre of it. And they wanted that. One of their aunts spent all of her life on the land. She was 93 years old when she died. And she died after those &#8220;For Sale&#8221; signs went up out there on that farm &#8212; auction sign went up on the farm. She was in the hospital. The next month she was dead. That was January &#8212; she was dead by October.</p>
<p>But we kept working at it. And we found some honest lawyers &#8212; they were white. I wish I could say that about all lawyers, especially black lawyers, but they will nickel and dime you to death. I don&#8217;t have &#8212; sorry &#8212; I don&#8217;t have two dozen pennies for most lawyers. But anyway that land has been saved, you know.</p>
<p>But they were trying to force a sale of all of it. They&#8217;ll eventually get 62 acres of the 515. And guess what? They have a white man already lined up to buy it. And it&#8217;s the man on [unclear 34:41], which is what he wanted.</p>
<p>But you can &#8212; what I want to say to you: You can do good. And y&#8217;all going to be smart. You&#8217;re going to go on and &#8212; and get good jobs. Look, reach back and help somebody. That&#8217;s what we were taught. That&#8217;s what our folk did, you know. It looks like the more &#8212; the better we do, the more free we are, the more divided we become, you know. It looks like we don&#8217;t care about each other any more. You know, that&#8217;s why kids can just, you know &#8212; y&#8217;all know what happened in the day. He did something wrong, everybody in the community got you, you know. Well that does happen anymore. And we have to get back to that.</p>
<p>If we going to rebuild our communities, if we going to get with all of the problems we have in our communities, it will take all of us working together to solve them. We can&#8217;t turn our backs. And you never know who you&#8217;re helping. You could be helping the second black President of the United States.</p>
<p>Now, I need to tell you a little bit about Rural Development. There &#8212; There are at least 40 programs at Rural Development, but I&#8217;ll just talk to you briefly about a couple of them. The main one is the Housing Program. We have more money for single-family housing, direct loans &#8212; and that&#8217;s loans from the agency &#8212; than we&#8217;ve ever had in the history of the program.</p>
<p>But we having trouble getting that money out the door and guess why: credit issues. They had to send me extra help from Washington to try to help because of the stimulus money. See, we have more money for direct loans for the low &#8212; very low &#8212; income and moderate income individuals. And guess what? Those loans &#8212; it&#8217;s a 100% loan. You can buy the land and build a house &#8212; 100% loan. No private mortgage insurance, those loans are directly from USDA. And folks will let a little cell phone and other stuff you don&#8217;t even need keeping you from being able to &#8212; to acquire an asset that you really need &#8212; which is a home. We&#8217;ve got to be more careful about our credit.</p>
<p>I was talking with a young lady that&#8217;s actually a relative in a major position, and &#8212; and she &#8212; she was letting the hospital &#8212; the hospital was getting ready to&#8230; garnish her check. She works for the city. And I said, &#8220;Do you understand that goes on your credit?&#8221; See, [unclear 37:46] in the hospital counted on, you know, she &#8212; it was after she had her child. I said, &#8220;You could have told them &#8216;I&#8230;can pay 25 dollars a month&#8217;&#8221; and they would have accepted that. But she didn&#8217;t make that step. So now here they were getting ready to start taking it from her pay. And that goes on her credit. And I said, &#8220;You want a house one day &#8212; you&#8217;ll never be able to get a house.&#8221; Now, she does some foolish stuff with her money. I won&#8217;t go into some of the foolish stuff. But I &#8212; I want to say that to &#8212; to us.</p>
<p>And young people: You know, that&#8217;s one of the things I remember from my father. He used to talk to us about business and credit. And what he said to us: &#8220;You need to always keep a good credit record. You may not have any money, but you can always get some.&#8221; And we need to keep that in mind. We need to stop trying to get things we don&#8217;t need, you know. Take the time to get the money &#8212; you know, to save the money for what you want &#8212; and you can do that. You can do that. You can do that. You don&#8217;t have to have everything right now, okay?</p>
<p>We also have in addition to the direct loans from the agency, we are&#8230;the guaranteed loan program for housing. And&#8230;those loans are for people with a slightly higher income. That &#8212; That program has been so successful that we are about to run out of money. And I&#8217;m talking about all over the country. I&#8217;m talking about billions. And in Georgia, you know in 2008, they made like 1265 guaranteed loans. Last year, we did almost 4500. And this year, if the money had not run out, if it doesn&#8217;t run out &#8212; I&#8217;m hoping they going to get some more &#8212; we might do as many as 12,000, you know. If there was ever a time for people to become home owners, now is the time. And you can thank President Obama for that.</p>
<p>And I said something briefly to you about the &#8212; the business and industry money. We&#8217;ve got to get our act together. We got to start thinking about becoming entrepreneurs, you know. And young people you need to think of that as you &#8212; as you mature. You know, get some education. Learn how to do it right and then think of going into business. Until our communities look at how we can grow our own businesses, we&#8217;ll be &#8212; we&#8217;ll forever be at the mercy of these companies that will come in, use up the tax credits, and leave.</p>
<p>Hey, didn&#8217;t y&#8217;all lose the chicken in the street, here. They will [use] up your tax credit and move on to another community and use theirs too, and leave you high and dry. We can do some &#8212; you know, you can think of creating your businesses and making those dollars flow over and over in your own community.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the Repair Loan Program for &#8212; for senior citizens 62 and over who are lower income. You can qualify for a grant of 7500 dollars. Or, if you have repayment ability &#8212; and those payments can&#8230;some of them are very low, 25 dollars a month &#8212; you get a one percent loan up to 25 &#8212; 20,000 dollars. And the &#8212; the $7500 is only for helping safety issues, you know, like something with your bathroom or something else in the house. But if you wanted to do some renovations up to $20,000, you can get a one percent loan to be able to do that.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into the other programs because a lot of them [are] different types programs for cities. And, you know, I had a visit from the mayor and your city manager and &#8212; and I&#8217;ve thought about y&#8217;all a lot and I&#8217;m not &#8212; my commitment is to the rural area. My commitment even more so is to south Georgia. That&#8217;s were I&#8217;m from. I can&#8217;t say that up in north Georgia. But they don&#8217;t seem to have a problem getting the money.</p>
<p>Okay, I won&#8217;t keep going on tonight, but just let me say there is a saying: &#8220;Life is a grindstone; but&#8230;whether it grinds us down or polishes us up depends on us,&#8221; you know.</p>
<p>Thank you.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/25/transcript-shirley-sherrods-march-27th-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Contradiction in Obama&#8217;s Quotes?  Deficit Spending and Unemployment Benefits</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/24/a-contradiction-in-obamas-quotes-deficit-spending-and-unemployment-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/24/a-contradiction-in-obamas-quotes-deficit-spending-and-unemployment-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GuestBlogger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama accuses republicans of playing politics with unemployment extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama moves to eliminate waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing two quotes only 4 days apart...

Click on this article's title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;When we continue to spend as if deficits don&#8217;t matter, that means our kids and our grandkids may windup saddled with debt that they&#8217;ll never be able to repay&#8230;&#8221; President Barack Obama, Thursday, July 22nd, 2010.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s time to stop holding workers laid off in this recession hostage to Washington politics&#8230;&#8221; President Barack Obama, Monday, July 19, 2010 (urging Republicans to eliminate their requirements for $34 billion in spending cuts to help pay for an extension in unemployment benefits prior to voting for the extension).</p>
<p>Is it just me who sees the contradiction here?</p>
<p>Mr. President, if you truly meant the first quote, it&#8217;s the Democratic leadership, not the Republicans you should be taking aim at.  An extension in unemployment benefits is needed, additional deficit spending is not.</p>
<p>Source: CBS News, ABC News, CNN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/24/a-contradiction-in-obamas-quotes-deficit-spending-and-unemployment-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Shirley Sherrod a Racist? (Video link to her entire speech included)</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/23/video-link-is-shirley-sherrod-a-racist/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/23/video-link-is-shirley-sherrod-a-racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Left</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complete video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deparetment of Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of Agriculter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[details of Sherrod's speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[full sherrod video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.A.A.C.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shirley sherrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snookered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time stamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA Rural Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Details surrounding the case, a link to the full video and a brief outline (with approximately time stamps) the contents of the speech - including the controversial statement which cost the former State Director her job.

Click on this article's title to open...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Shirley Sherrod, the now former State Director for the USDA Rural Development, the racist that even the N.A.A.C.P. reportedly accused her to be earlier this week?  The answer to that question (and the importance of that answer) depends on who you talk to and when.</p>
<p>Since the story first broke, many have reversed their stance &#8211; particularly on the political left and within the Federal Government.  First calling for her resignation the NAACP is a high profile example of an organization that has shifted its stance by 180 degrees and is now a staunch defender of Sherrod.  The Department of Agriculture likewise has shifted from chastising her to, according to one report, preparing to offer her a brand new job.</p>
<p>Even among those who continue to openly question Sherrod&#8217;s actual opinions concerning race, there appears to be a growing consensus.  A consensus that the remarks that first started the controversy may not be where the focus of the media should after all.  Instead some have pointed out that this case is an excellent example of where the Left&#8217;s overly abundant use of the &#8216;Race Card&#8217; has led us.  That it shows even the Left, which previously has not been known to concede internal problems with racism, has become willing to accept knee jerk reactions to such accusations without properly investigating the evidence presented.  That if the Left is willing to smear the name of one of its own so easily, then other politially related accusations of racism (such as those concerning racism in the Tea Party) must be more thoroughly investigated before any actions or reporting takes place.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.naacp.org/news/entry/video_sherrod/">That said, for many the question still remains &#8211; is she a racist?  </p>
<p>Decide for yourself.  Click anywhere on this paragraph to view a video of Shirley Sherrod&#8217;s speech from March 27th at the N.A.A.C.P.&#8217;s 20th Annual Freedom Fund Banquet.  Please note this video is provided by the N.A.A.C.P. and may be pulled at anytime by that organization.</a></p>
<p>We additionally have complied the following brief listing of highlights (and their associated approximate times) from her speech:</p>
<p><strong>0 &#8211; 17 min :</strong> Provides background information, including details surrounding the murder of her father by a white man.<br />
<em><strong>17 min :</strong></em> Describes her initial reluctance to help a poor white farmer, when he came to request assistance.  She admits she initially decided to only do the bare minimum to avoid problems with the Dept. of Agriculture.  However eventually she states that she saw how &#8216;his own kind&#8217; was mistreating him so she decided to do what she could to help.<br />
<strong>21 min :</strong> A portion of the video appears to have been edited out or at least the video has been spliced together.<br />
<strong>23 min :</strong> Begins buildup toward accusing opposition to Obama-Care as based on racism against having a black President.  Details how she has learned that originally both White and Black indentured servants brought to America could earn their freedom and in fact were viewed as equals.  How they often married each other regardless of race.  How this was eventually changed, resulting in permanent slavery for the black person and then appears to imply that opposition to Obama-Care is simply one more attempt to maintain differences between the races.<br />
<strong>25.25 min :</strong> Repeats she no longer believes in Black vs White but that we must help the poor regardless of color.<br />
<strong>28 min :</strong> Emphasizes all colors need to work together and softly builds toward speech focusing on parents setting goals for their children and responsibility for yourself and your community.<br />
<strong>37 min :</strong> Discusses Stimulus money currently available thru the Department of Agriculture and the importance of maintaining a good credit record.</p>
<p>Sources: ABC News, Fox News, the N.A.A.C.P.</p>
<p>TABRIGHT &#8211; <a style="border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important;" href="http://www.TabRight.com">Proving you don&#8217;t have to be left to be RIGHT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/23/video-link-is-shirley-sherrod-a-racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Obama Signing Financial Reform &#8211; Partisanship Overflowith</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/22/transcript-obama-signing-financial-reform-partisanship-overflowith/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/22/transcript-obama-signing-financial-reform-partisanship-overflowith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial reform act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcript of President Obama's openly partisan speech at the signing of the Financial Reform Act.

Click on this article's title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a performance that can only be described as pure partisan, President Obama signed the controversial Financial Reform Act on Wednesday. From the blatant act of signing the bill in a room named for former President Reagon (a well know supporter of Deregulation) to comments concerning &#8216;a minority parties&#8217; efforts to block and stall the bill, it was obvious the Administration felt no reason to reach out to the right. One political observer went as far to say that it was clear (despite warnings from so economists that the bill may result in a prolong depression) the Democrats intend to use this bill as a focus for the upcoming elections.</p>
<p>The following is an unofficial transcript of President Obama&#8217;s speech&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>President Obama</strong>: <em>We are gathered in the heart of our nation&#8217;s capital, surrounded by memorials to leaders and citizens who served our nation in its earliest days and in its days of greatest trial. Today is such a time for America.</em></p>
<p><em>Over the past two years, we have faced the worst recession since the Great Depression. Eight million people lost their jobs. Tens of millions saw the value of their homes and retirement savings plummet. Countless businesses have been unable to get the loans they need and many have been forced to shut their doors. And although the economy is growing again, too many people are still feeling the pain of the downturn.</p>
<p>Now, while a number of factors led to such a severe recession, the primary cause was a breakdown in our financial system. It was a crisis born of a failure of responsibility from certain corners of Wall Street to the halls of power in Washington. For years, our financial sector was governed by antiquated and poorly enforced rules that allowed some to game the system and take risks that endangered the entire economy.</p>
<p>Unscrupulous lenders locked consumers into complex loans with hidden costs. Firms like AIG placed massive, risky bets with borrowed money. And while the rules left abuse and excess unchecked, they also left taxpayers on the hook if a big bank or financial institution ever failed.</p>
<p>Now, even before the crisis hit, I went to Wall Street and I called for common-sense reforms to protect consumers and our economy as a whole. And soon after taking office, I proposed a set of reforms to empower consumers and investors, to bring the shadowy deals that caused this crisis into the light of day, and to put a stop to taxpayer bailouts once and for all. [applause] Today, thanks to a lot of people in this room, those reforms will become the law of the land.</p>
<p>For the last year, Chairmen Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have worked day and night &#8212; (applause) &#8212; Barney and Chris have worked day and night to bring about this reform. And I am profoundly grateful to them. I would be remiss if I didn&#8217;t also express my appreciation to Senator Harry Reid and Speaker Nancy Pelosi for their leadership. It wouldn&#8217;t have happened without them. [applause]</p>
<p>Passing this bill was no easy task. To get there, we had to overcome the furious lobbying of an array of powerful interest groups and a partisan minority determined to block change. So the members who are here today, both on the stage and in the audience, they have done a great service in devoting so much time and expertise to this effort, to looking out for the public interests and not the special interests. [applause] And I also want to thank the three Republican senators who put partisanship aside &#8212; (applause) &#8212; judged this bill on the merits, and voted for reform. We&#8217;re grateful to them. [applause] And the Republican House members. [applause] Good to see you, Joe. [applause]</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s put this in perspective. The fact is, the financial industry is central to our nation&#8217;s ability to grow, to prosper, to compete and to innovate. There are a lot of banks that understand and fulfill this vital role, and there are a whole lot of bankers who want to do right &#8212; and do right &#8212; by their customers. This reform will help foster innovation, not hamper it. It is designed to make sure that everybody follows the same set of rules, so that firms compete on price and quality, not on tricks and not on traps.</p>
<p>It demands accountability and responsibility from everyone. It provides certainty to everybody, from bankers to farmers to business owners to consumers. And unless your business model depends on cutting corners or bilking your customers, you&#8217;ve got nothing to fear from reform. [applause]</p>
<p>Now, for all those Americans who are wondering what Wall Street reform means for you, here&#8217;s what you can expect. If you&#8217;ve ever applied for a credit card, a student loan, or a mortgage, you know the feeling of signing your name to pages of barely understandable fine print. What often happens as a result is that many Americans are caught by hidden fees and penalties, or saddled with loans they can&#8217;t afford.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what happened to Robin Fox, hit with a massive rate increase on her credit card balance even though she paid her bills on time. That&#8217;s what happened to Andrew Giordano, who discovered hundreds of dollars in overdraft fees on his bank statement, fees he had no idea he might face. Both are here today. Well, with this law, unfair rate hikes, like the one that hit Robin, will end for good. [applause] And we&#8217;ll ensure that people like Andrew aren&#8217;t unwittingly caught by overdraft fees when they sign up for a checking account. [applause]</p>
<p>With this law, we&#8217;ll crack down on abusive practices in the mortgage industry. We&#8217;ll make sure that contracts are simpler, putting an end to many hidden penalties and fees in complex mortgages, so folks know what they&#8217;re signing.</p>
<p>With this law, students who take out college loans will be provided clear and concise information about their obligations.</p>
<p>And with this law, ordinary investors, like seniors and folks saving for retirement, will be able to receive more information about the costs and risks of mutual funds and other investment products, so that they can make better financial decisions as to what will work for them.</p>
<p>So, all told, these reforms represent the strongest consumer financial protections in history. [applause] In history. And these protections will be enforced by a new consumer watchdog with just one job: looking out for people, not big banks, not lenders, not investment houses, looking out for people as they interact with the financial system.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not just good for consumers; that&#8217;s good for the economy. Because reform will put a stop to a lot of the bad loans that fueled a debt-based bubble. And it will mean all companies will have to seek customers by offering better products, instead of more deceptive ones.</p>
<p>Now, beyond the consumer protections I&#8217;ve outlined, reform will also rein in the abuse and excess that nearly brought down our financial system. It will finally bring transparency to the kinds of complex and risky transactions that helped trigger the financial crisis. Shareholders will also have a greater say on the pay of CEOs and other executives, so they can reward success instead of failure.</p>
<p>And finally, because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street&#8217;s mistakes. [applause] There will be no more tax-funded bailouts period. [applause] If a large financial institution should ever fail, this reform gives us the ability to wind it down without endangering the broader economy. And there will be new rules to make clear that no firm is somehow protected because it is &#8216;too big to fail,&#8217; so we don&#8217;t have another AIG.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what this reform will mean. Now, it doesn&#8217;t mean our work is over. For these new rules to be effective, regulators will have to be vigilant. We may need to make adjustments along the way as our financial system adapts to these new changes and changes around the globe. No law can force anybody to be responsible; it&#8217;s still incumbent on those on Wall Street to heed the lessons of this crisis in terms of how they conduct their businesses.</p>
<p>The fact is every American, from Main Street to Wall Street, has a stake in our financial system. Wall Street banks and firms invest the capital that makes it possible for start-ups to sell new products. They provide loans to businesses to expand and to hire. They back mortgages for families purchasing a new home. That&#8217;s why we&#8217;ll all stand to gain from these reforms. We all win when investors around the world have confidence in our markets. We all win when shareholders have more power and more information. We all win when consumers are protected against abuse. And we all win when folks are rewarded based on how well they perform, not how well they evade accountability.</p>
<p>In the end, our financial system only works when our market is only free, when there are clear rules and basic safeguards that prevent abuse, that check excess, that ensure that it is more profitable to play by the rules than to game the system. And that&#8217;s what these reforms are designed to achieve &#8212; no more, no less. Because that&#8217;s how we will ensure that our economy works for consumers, that it works for investors, that it works for financial institutions, that it works for all of us.</p>
<p>This is the central lesson not only of this crisis but of our history. Ultimately, there&#8217;s no dividing line between Main Street and Wall Street. We rise or fall together as one nation. So these reforms will help lift our economy and lead all of us to a stronger, more prosperous future.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m so honored to sign these reforms into law, and I&#8217;m so grateful to everybody who worked so hard to make this day possible. Thank you very much, everybody.</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/22/transcript-obama-signing-financial-reform-partisanship-overflowith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transcript: Obama celbrates recovery by introducing 3 hopelessly unemployed &#8211; July 19, 2010</title>
		<link>http://tabright.com/2010/07/21/transcript-obama-celbrates-recovery-by-introducing-3-hopelessly-unemployed-july-19-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://tabright.com/2010/07/21/transcript-obama-celbrates-recovery-by-introducing-3-hopelessly-unemployed-july-19-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GuestBlogger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TabRight.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uemployment extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tabright.com/?p=7884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcript and commentary of Obama's July 19th unemployment speech...

Click on this article's title to continue reading...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday the President held a press conference aimed at pressuring Republicans to pass the most recent unemployment benefits extension. Instead, for some, the conference came across more like the perfect political ad against Obama and his economic policies then anything else.</p>
<p>Attempting to exploit the economic plight of three unemployed Americans the President introduced each of the individuals &#8211; an auto worker, a fitness instructor and a realtor.  He made special note of their circumstances and attempted to sound down to earth and understanding. That said, ironically some critics quickly pointed out that the first to be introduced actually worked for a non-US company (albeit the North American branch of Honda, a Japanese company).</p>
<p>The following is an unofficial transcript of his July 19th speech:</p>
<p><em>President Obama</em><strong>: Good morning, everybody. Right now, across this country, many Americans are sitting at the kitchen table, they&#8217;re scanning the classifieds, they&#8217;re updating their resumes or sending out another job application, hoping that this time they&#8217;ll hear back from a potential employer. And they&#8217;re filled with a sense of uncertainty about where their next paycheck will come from. And I know the only thing that will entirely free them of those worries &#8212; the only thing that will fully lift that sense of uncertainty &#8212; is the security of a new job.</strong></p>
<p><strong>To that end, we all have to continue our efforts to do everything in our power to spur growth and hiring. And I hope the Senate acts this week on a package of tax cuts and expanded lending for small businesses, where most of America&#8217;s jobs are created.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;ve got a lot of work to do to make sure that we are digging ourselves out of this tough economic hole that we&#8217;ve been in. But even as we work to jumpstart job growth in the private sector, even as we work to get businesses hiring again, we also have another responsibility: to offer emergency assistance to people who desperately need it &#8212; to Americans who&#8217;ve been laid off in this recession. We&#8217;ve got a responsibility to help them make ends meet and support their families even as they&#8217;re looking for another job.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so essential to pass the unemployment insurance extension that comes up for a vote tomorrow. We need to pass it for men like Jim Chukalas, who&#8217;s with me here today. Jim worked as a parts manager at a Honda dealership until about two years ago. He&#8217;s posted resumes everywhere. He&#8217;s gone door-to-door looking for jobs. But he hasn&#8217;t gotten a single interview. He&#8217;s trying to be strong for his two young kids, but now that he&#8217;s exhausted his unemployment benefits, that&#8217;s getting harder to do.</p>
<p>We need to pass it for women like Leslie Macko, who lost her job at a fitness center last year and has been looking for work ever since. Because she&#8217;s eligible for only a few more weeks of unemployment, she&#8217;s doing what she never thought she&#8217;d have to do &#8212; not at this point, anyway. She&#8217;s turning to her father for financial support.</p>
<p>And we need to pass it for Americans like Denise Gibson, who was laid off from a real estate agency earlier this year. Denise has been interviewing for jobs &#8212; but so far nothing has turned up. Meanwhile, she&#8217;s fallen further and further behind on her rent. And with her unemployment benefits set to expire, she&#8217;s worried about what the future holds.</p>
<p>We need to pass it for all the Americans who haven&#8217;t been able to find work in an economy where there are five applicants for every opening; who need emergency relief to help them pay the rent and cover their utilities and put food on the table while they&#8217;re looking for another job.</p>
<p>And for a long time, there&#8217;s been a tradition &#8212; under both Democratic and Republican Presidents &#8212; to offer relief to the unemployed. That was certainly the case under my predecessor, when Republican senators voted several times to extend emergency unemployment benefits. But right now, these benefits &#8212; benefits that are often the person&#8217;s sole source of income while they&#8217;re looking for work &#8212; are in jeopardy.</p>
<p>And I have to say, after years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, the same people who didn&#8217;t have any problem spending hundreds of billions of dollars on tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans are now saying we shouldn&#8217;t offer relief to middle-class Americans like Jim or Leslie or Denise, who really need help.</p>
<p>Over the past few weeks, a majority of senators have tried &#8212; not once, not twice, but three times &#8212; to extend emergency relief on a temporary basis. Each time, a partisan minority in the Senate has used parliamentary maneuvers to block a vote, denying millions of people who are out of work much-needed relief. These leaders in the Senate who are advancing a misguided notion that emergency relief somehow discourages people from looking for a job should talk to these folks.</p>
<p>That attitude I think reflects a lack of faith in the American people, because the Americans I hear from in letters and meet in town hall meetings &#8212; Americans like Leslie and Jim and Denise &#8212; they&#8217;re not looking for a handout. They desperately want to work. Just right now they can&#8217;t find a job. These are honest, decent, hardworking folks who&#8217;ve fallen on hard times through no fault of their own, and who have nowhere else to turn except unemployment benefits and who need emergency relief to help them weather this economic storm.</p>
<p>Now, tomorrow we will have another chance to offer them that relief, to do right by not just Jim and Leslie and Denise, but all the Americans who need a helping hand right now &#8212; and I hope we seize it. It&#8217;s time to stop holding workers laid off in this recession hostage to Washington politics. It&#8217;s time to do what&#8217;s right &#8212; not for the next election but for the middle class. We&#8217;ve got to stop blocking emergency relief for Americans who are out of work. We&#8217;ve got to extend unemployment insurance. We need to pass those tax cuts for small businesses and the lending for small businesses.</p>
<p>Times are hard right now. We are moving in the right direction. I know it&#8217;s getting close to an election, but there are times where you put elections aside. This is one of those times. And that&#8217;s what I hope members of Congress on both sides of the aisle will do tomorrow.</p>
<p>Thanks very much.</p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tabright.com/2010/07/21/transcript-obama-celbrates-recovery-by-introducing-3-hopelessly-unemployed-july-19-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
